[google28b52e0868d1e307.html]

Search This Blog

Friday 20 April 2018

C.S. LEWIS - IS HE THE FATHER OF ECUMENISM ? BY JACK THOMSON


We know that C S Lewis has been, and continues to be widely acclaimed as a great apologist for Christianity and, while it is not my purpose in this piece to dispute such acclamation - it is certainly my intention to explore the possibility that this prolific writer was not a Christian - by any biblical definition of the term.

Preposterous - untrue - unfair - unfounded - ridiculous - risible - heretical - irrational - you cannot be serious - judge not lest ye be judged…The tirade of comments which I’ve received in knee jerk defence of C S Lewis’ Christian integrity are as endless - as they have been formidable - as they have been hostile. Indeed I sometimes wonder if it wouldn’t be more acceptable in some ‘Christian’ circles to attack Christ’s claims of divinity rather than cast the ‘merest’ shadow of doubt over the authenticity of C S Lewis’ Christian status.

But, setting aside the subject of the popular author’s Christian credentials let me digress, momentarily, by introducing the following questions:

Does a sport’s commentator need to be practised in the sport on which he/she offers informed commentary?

For instance, the renowned, now retired Formula One Racing commentator - Murray Walker - was he ever a Formula One racing driver?

Since the answer to both questions is an emphatic ‘No’, I can promptly return to the main theme with the affirmation that a person doesn’t need to be practised in a discipline to become an ‘expert commentator’ on that discipline. - and it is with this ‘thin edge’ of reason that I hope to begin the arduous process of wedging open the most prejudiced of closed minds to the possibility that a person can have an intellectual grasp of, and be an ‘expert commentator’ on Christianity - without necessarily being a real ‘Christian’.

And, having placed that ‘thin edge’ of reason against, what might only be, the slightest of fissures on the stubborn skull of the partisan, pro-Lewis mindset - let me continue by attempting to hammer the wedge in a little deeper and open the crack a little wider…..

Thwack, thwack.

Window cleaners are an interesting bunch, are they not?

The window cleaner’s task enables him to gather a considerable amount of information about customers’ homes and lifestyles - without any need to enter their houses. When the chamois champ goes about his daily business he can’t help but engage his natural inquisitiveness and explore the furnishings, fittings and personal effects which lie in the rooms behind each of the windows he has cleaned.

Indeed, if such a cleaner, for whatever reason, developed an obsessive interest in any particular customer - he could, if he so desired, prepare a very detailed dossier on that client’s home, habits and interests - and it would all have been done, quite naturally, in the normal course of his work -  without the necessity of entering the home.

So the questions arise, and they are crucial questions:

Was C S Lewis an occupant of a house called ‘Christian Faith’ - or was he merely an inquisitive window cleaner who, for his own selfish reasons, took a special interest in that particular house and occupiers?

Or, to put it another way, did C S Lewis glean all of his information about Christianity purely as a self indulging intellectual exercise - or did he obtain his knowledge by actually becoming a spiritually regenerate  Christian ?.

Thwack, thwack.

Well, despite his copious knowledge of the ‘Christian Faith’ - and his undoubted intellectual familiarity with some of its general precepts and principles, C S Lewis didn’t seem to have much of a ‘inkling’ as to where the only entrance to ‘Christian Faith’ was located - and neither did he have any idea of the doorway’s form - which raises the interesting question of whether or not he had ever actually entered the house………

Thwack, thwack.

So, what of this doorway - where is this ‘one and only entrance’ to ‘Christian Faith’ of which C S Lewis had apparently no personal knowledge and experience?

Well - the door is invisible to the naked eye, indeed it cannot be detected by any natural human sense, nor can it be intellectually appraised - because, like the house which it serves, its substance is spiritual - and therefore, it can only be spiritually discerned and understood.

Yes indeed, as the apostle Paul confirmed in 1 Corinthians 2/14, no natural man (as C S Lewis must have been before his ‘conversion’) is capable of true spiritual discernment:

But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

Unless, that is - and according to Jesus, the natural man undergoes true spiritual birth:

Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again. –

 John 3/5-7

Thwack, thwack………

Not that C S Lewis’ experience of spiritual regeneration reflected this.

Thwack, thwack.

Consider the author’s own description of his ‘conversion’ experience:

You must picture me alone in that room at Magdalen, night after night, feeling, whenever my mind lifted even for a second from my work, the steady, unrelenting approach of Him whom I so earnestly desired not to meet. That which I greatly feared had at last come upon me. In the Trinity Term of 1929 I gave in, and admitted that God was God, and knelt and prayed: perhaps, that night, the most dejected and reluctant convert in all England" (Surprised By Joy, ch. 14, p. 266).

Well - it might have been the ‘unrelenting approach of Him’ whom he so earnestly desired not to meet - but I think that this unwelcome 'god' had a more natural origin - I believe that his unwanted visitor went by the name of 'cognitive dissonance'.

Cognitive dissonance is a common psychological condition experienced by all who can hold established attitudes on any subject. The condition presents as a terrible feeling of unease and occurs when a person, in holding a settled viewpoint, is confronted with information which challenges that viewpoint.

When cognitive dissonance prevails, the host will seek to regain peace of mind by engaging one or, if need be, two consecutively operating mechanisms. Initially the host will stubbornly disregard the opposing information and, if this is successful, peace of mind will, once again, prevail - and there will be no more to be done. However, should the incoming information (in over-riding the initial ‘deaf ear’) be persistent and unrelenting in its presentation and persuasion, this might induce a second, more dramatic and very much different response - that of a sudden ‘paradigm shift’ - the result of which is a complete rejection of the established attitude, and the unconditional acceptance of the new viewpoint.

C S Lewis was friends with the Roman Catholic writer J R Tolkien, and had been influenced by G K Chesterton, another Roman Catholic writer - as well as being schooled and heavily influenced through the writings George MacDonald - a Scottish (Universalist) minister and writer of fantasy tales.

With the weight of their combined theistic beliefs warring against the author's established atheistic mind set, an increasingly unbearable mental stress, i.e., ‘cognitive dissonance’ would have prevailed in his psyche. And, when this tension reached intolerable levels it would have precipitated a sudden 'paradigm shift' in his thinking and, Voila, our reluctant hero moved instantly from being a stubborn atheist to becoming a confirmed 'Christian'.

In other words C S Lewis' conversion was not 'spiritual' - it was a natural phenomenon which had nothing to do with Christ's supernatural union with his hitherto unregenerate spirit......and had everything to do with the author instinctively, naturally and selfishly seeking to preserve and promote the ‘intellectual’ peace of his own mind.

There are many, many people of the C S Lewis type who have become ‘Christian’ based on their own natural, self preserving and self promoting terms and, because 'their god' essentially remains their own (unregenerate) mind and emotion, they will constantly experience difficulty in extending unconditional authority to God's word. And, alas, when a contentious issue raises it ‘discordant’ head, and they start to feel the goads of conflict between God’s Word and their own established opinion they will, quite naturally, seek to preserve their ‘peace of mind’ by ignoring God’s word - while still maintaining, with one excuse or another, that their ‘traditional’ or ‘modern’ slant on Biblical teaching is ‘reasonable and rational’

I understand that C S Lewis perceived his own ‘spiritual’ re-birth as a life long process which involved as much of his own effort and initiative - as it did God’s.

He referred to God’s presence in His own, or anyone’s life as the ‘Christ life’ (how very impersonal) and he also asserted that the way in which to improve - or increase this ‘Christ life’ resource was by a combination of three different means viz. baptism, belief and participation in the Mass, the Eucharist - or Communion.

Baptism (in the true biblical sense) and ‘belief’ (presumably in Christ) are surely things which would be practiced after eternal birth i.e., after a person had been made spiritually alive in and to Christ - and would be undertaken - or practised to confirm rather than initiate or create new eternal life.

And, likewise, participation in the Lord’s Supper is essentially a commemoration of Christ’s sacrifice, which would - and always will be carried out by those who have already been ‘born again’. As for his inclusion of the Roman Catholic Mass……..well, there is nothing biblical - or Christian about that particular ceremony….and to refer to it as ‘Christian’ must, in itself, call his ‘spiritual integrity’ into serious question.

I can only conclude that his understanding of ‘Christian Faith’ was gleaned from his own external observations - and not as one who had truly entered His Father’s house. And I come to this conclusion with Christian conviction because, through the grace of God, I live in ‘Christian Faith’ - and the hallway which C S Lewis describes in one of his books - with its various doors leading to, and occupied by different denominations - it isn’t there - it just isn’t there - and neither is it planned, for it was never in the Architect’s original blueprint:

My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me. I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one: I in them and you in me. May they be brought to complete unity to let the world know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me.

 John 17/20-23.

Thwack, thwack…….

The problem with C S Lewis and all who come to ‘adopt’ Christianity as a preferred lifestyle - because they have been persuaded ‘intellectually’ that it is in their best personal interests so to do - is that they are ‘coming to Christ’ on their own selfish (unrighteous) terms, and selfish motive (unrighteousness) is not eternal in derivation or spirit - and therefore cannot contribute in the remotest way to eternal birth. It is that simple. New eternal life needs eternal and perfectly selfless - or sinless parentage - which qualities mankind is absolutely incapable of producing.

Eternal conception requires immaculate contribution coming together in immaculate, selfless consummation to give birth to immaculate life, and thanks be to God, it is God who has provided the ‘absolute perfection’ in every instance:

When the eternal Spirit of God descends upon and unites with any person, it does not unite with the sin which has enshrouded and corrupted that person’s true eternal identity, rather it penetrates that sinful mantle - and unites with, and consummates a life giving relationship with that person’s original and true eternal identity.

It is a system which cannot fail, and does not fail, because there is no sin - no anti-life influences to adversely effect a perfect outcome.

God - Jesus Christ is eternally pure; the eternal essence which lies implicit and swaddled within every elect person is eternally pure, the matching of the two partners is perfect because they are the separated parts of a previously intact spiritual reality - and the entire ‘reconciliation’ process is being carried out in the pure and selfless Spirit of Eternal Love.

And the outcome of that eternal consummation is a redeemed and complete child of God - an eternal child of God who will grow and develop as it focuses and feeds exclusively on his/her true eternal companion - on Christ's Holy Spirit for all of his/her spiritual guidance and sustenance:

Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.

He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you.

John 16/13-14.

Thwack, thwack.

I believe that C S Lewis lived in a house called ‘Mere Christianity’ - I have never visited it, never had the inclination - but I am aware that the driveway serving this mansion is served by very wide and very grand gates which are situated at the end of a very broad avenue called Destruction Way:

Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

Matthew 7/13-14.

Thwack, craaaaaaaack.



Why have I written in such a provocative - controversial way about C S Lewis?

The main reason is that I believe that the writings of C. S. Lewis have been directly responsible for the promotion of the strong - and strengthening spirit of Ecumenism which is prevalent in ‘Christendom’ today.

And Ecumenism does not worship God, as Christ directed, in spirit and in truth - God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth. – John 4/24. Rather the followers of the ecumenical movement worship ‘God’ in accordance with the lowest common denominator which prevails among their previously mixed and conflicting beliefs - to the continued exclusion, or subsequent rejection of vital eternal precepts.

In consequence Ecumenism produces a false Christianity which does not promote, and therefore cannot produce true conversion (mortal to eternal) in the lives of those who follow its teaching and, as a result, cannot effect real change in the lives of its adherents. 

19 comments:

  1. This is total bunk. If you look at CS Lewis - Read his step son's biography 'Jack' about how fruit of love was a complete and total part of the bearing and life as a believer in Christ.

    ReplyDelete
  2. C.S. Lewis was MOST certainly a promoter of ecumenism, of that there is NO doubt whatsoever!
    His works have only served to considerably dilute the Gospel of Christ.

    For a more in-depth (only 2 pages) analysis of this so-called 'Christian' teacher:

    www.ivanfoster.net/pdf/May0106.pdf

    God bless

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have just read your link Colin.. it is very informative. Clearly CS Lewis faith and associations were very questionable.

    Eric Barger: "Paganism Sympathy - Perhaps the reason that Tolkien and Lewis showed pagan sympathy in their stories is due to their affiliation with one Charles Williams who was a member of the highly satanic, Qabalistic "Order of the Golden Dawn." (The "Order of the Golden Dawn" was primarily made up of mystical "Christians" and former followers of Madame Blavatsky the founder of the Theosophical Society that still adhered to Luciferianism.) Williams, along with Tolkien and Lewis, were members of a close knit Oxford reading group known as “The Inklings.” This is almost certainly where Lewis arrived at his extra-biblical ideas concerning the Holy Grail and other mid-evil myths." https://www.ericbarger.com/lotr.c.c.2.htm

    ReplyDelete
  4. P Brent's very dismissive response would suggest that he himself is suffering from a little 'cognitive dissonance'...
    Anyway, natural human kindness is not held exclusively by nominal, cultural/social christians. There are many people of other faiths and no faith who extend affection and charity to others.
    Christ Himself stated that not all who recognised His divinity were one with Him in Spirit. Matthew 7/21-23.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It is vital that we adhere to sound doctrine. If we do not see that Jesus Christ is the only way to salvation, then we should question whether our faith is genuine. The spirit of ecumenism is the spirit of Antichrist.

    "Examine yourselves, to see whether you are in the faith. Test yourselves. Or do you not realize this about yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you?—unless indeed you fail to meet the test!" 2 Corinthians 13:5

    God bless.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jack, you can be sure I am a regenerate believer in Christ Jesus - since 1980. I was brought to the LORD at age twenty having grown up Anglican. C.S. Lewis book 'Mere Christianity' which led me to consider again the claims of Christ from reading the Gospels and Bible again - and I was then saved. You can be sure that my life is not one of 'cognitive dissonance' in remaining faithful to Christ over 35 years. You should recall the Christ spoke of accepting those with differences in culture, influences. Lewis writings were obviously a product of his time, his literary imagination and the environment he kept. The Anglican church he belonged to was not as far into compromise when he lived. Christian ecumenism - yes to RCs' even - can be a good thing, and in fact we are to love all who call on the name of the LORD - AND DO you claim to know someones heart? Jesus only knew what was in man. This blog is good in so far as it corrects error and teaches, but most of the body of Christ is in some way or another straying from Apostolic teaching.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Indeed P Brent - Lewis’ writings were a product of his time – I don’t doubt that.
    But God’s word is eternal/constant and, ipso facto - unchanging, despite human efforts (inspired by the god of this world) to distort, dilute and adulterate it.
    Christ would not ask His listeners to watch out for false prophets - He would not ask them to probe beneath the surface to assess a person’s heart/motive - if it was sinful so to do. Matthew 7/15.
    And the apostle Paul warned of false apostles 2 Cor 11/13 - should we then not be on the alert?
    And God’s word tells the believer through Paul that a person who is spiritual can judge all things – 1 Cor 2/113-15.
    And this is only possible because all true believers are taught and counselled by the Holy Spirit – and the Holy Spirit is constant in His teaching - absolutely constant – without variation.
    If I am a true believer and have been ‘led to believe’ by the Holy Spirit that C S Lewis was a counterfeit Christian - then all true believers will be so led – any other conclusion is an appalling insult to the Holy Spirit.
    Ecumenism (aka carnal mixture) is a terrible insult to the Holy Spirit’s teaching ministry.
    God hates mixture - and He warns all believers to protect and preserve true doctrine - 1 Tim 4/16 and to contend for the Faith - Jude 3.

    ReplyDelete
  8. And what right minded true Christian would disagree with Jack's wise words? for he IS a VERY astute believer.

    God's true children have lopsided views on many things, most especially prophecy, but A-N-Y-T-H-I-N-G that gives but a tiny glimmer of a green light to ecumenism is from the pit of hell (Galatians 5.9), and Lewis's works FAR exceeded that!
    But, for the life of me, personally I find it most disturbing that so-called believers warm to ecumenical thinking at any level: The blood of Christ (the cross) is our O-N-L-Y hope! and let us ALL be steadfast on this; is THIS really so difficult?

    The Church of England had lost its way L-O-N-G before C.S.Lewis was even born! Bishop J.C.Ryle, generally reckoned to be the greatest Anglican Christian minister of his era (by true believers, at any rate!) said "once the old-wreck (C of E) departs from the 39 Articles, I will leave the sinking ship". Ryle wrote much against ecumenism and the increasing apostasy in his age. Does the 39 Articles have any relevance in todays C of E? I should hardly think any member of that now TOTALLY apostate church has even heard of them, let alone understand those most precious of creeds!

    Ecumenism is from the pit, for it negates the precious blood of Christ.

    God bless.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I would say Jack is presumptuous in judging Lewis a fraud - 'counterfeit Christian' did Lewis claim to be a ruler, or teacher or preacher of God's truth?- No - he was just a churchman he used his gift of literary imagination to convey the truth of the Word made flesh redemption, and the tempters evil schemes. And he belonged and therefor assented to Anglican doctrine- albeit it having shortcomings. His age, environs were not accepting the way you are of closely reading scripture - prophets and apostles. There is much good on this blog and I appreciate the insight from scripture that exposes false teaching - as I'm aware it's a needed faculty because of increased deception with the Body of Christ. however, I am thankful God used Lewis whose writings led me to believe and accept Christ as the word of God. I think everyone should be keen to observe that knowledge can puff up, but love for each other is what edifies. This is something Lewis promoted too.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thank you PB. When I was a very young Christian I read Mere Christianity and it did actually help me very much at the time. It was only later that I realised that all was not as it should be with him. He may not have been a teacher, but he was and is influential. I am concerned that his ecumenism will feed the current ecumenical trend - not only ecumenism but inter-faith. As for the RCC I suggest you listen to Richard Bennett who was a former RCC priest. I do not agree with his eschatology but he has a very powerful testimony about how he came out of the RCC cult. God bless. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCmsrJtdTUQ

    ReplyDelete
  11. Sorry, I'm in a bit of a rush, but here goes:

    PB – Whether you realise it or not, in addressing C S Lewis’ reasons for writing - you are, in effect, indulging in semantics. Of course, C S Lewis motive was to communicate and share his knowledge - why else would he publish and distribute his work? And when individuals desire to communicate and share their knowledge then they are, in effect, desiring to teach the recipients of their work – a desire which was fulfilled in you, because did you not earlier state that the writings of C S Lewis gave (taught) you a greater understanding of the Christian Faith?
    The fact that God used Lewis to bring you to faith – is no testimony to the spiritual integrity of C S Lewis, and Philippians 1/18 would tend to confirm this truth.
    And the love which purifies and edifies most successfully is the love spoken of in Ephesians 4/14-15:
    That we should no longer be children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men, in cunning craftiness of deceitful plotting, but speaking the truth in love, may we grow up in all things into Him who is the head – Christ-

    ReplyDelete
  12. PB – An unhurried afterthought: You state that you are thankful that God used the writings of C S Lewis (human persuasion and wisdom) to enable you to believe and accept Christ as the word of God…………. Can I respectfully suggest that you compare your experience with the following scripture:
    For I determined not to know anything among you except Jesus Christ and Him crucified. I was with you in weakness, in fear, and in much trembling. And my speech and my preaching were not with persuasive words of human wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power, that your faith should not be in the wisdom of men but in the power of God. - 1 Cor 2/2-5.
    And thereafter, can I further suggest that you prayerfully reflect on who is the foundation of your faith – C S Lewis or Jesus Christ.
    If it is C S Lewis then you have experienced an ‘intellectual conversion’ and you now have a ‘Christianised intellect’, however if the foundation and source of your faith is Jesus Christ - then you have truly experienced spiritual regeneration. You have been born again
    My prayer is that you have experienced the latter and that my writings have been used by God in the spirit of Ephesians 4/15 to open your eyes to the truth of C S Lewis’ true Christian status

    ReplyDelete
  13. Jack, Treena. Thank you for responding. Yes - I understand all those scriptures. Perhaps I was influenced by liberal minded christian humanists a lot in my faith early on and even up to recently- (having done a BA in English Lit also). But I have also understood as a child the bible to be the plumbline of truth, probably from my low Anglican upbringing. After being saved I was in charismatic, pentacostal and unfortunately WOF churches -I was taught in a home group using Derek Princes bible teaching- some good and some not so good. I was at the Toronto airport when it broke out, but never 'caught' it and I think my grounding in solid scriptural teaching guarded me from that. I've moved towards traditional bible believing faith since 2000 seeing more of the phoniness in many churches. It wasn't until recently (I thank God for some of Prasch videos) - 10 years ago that I saw in retrospect the deception which Satan has used with 'charismania' etc.
    God be blessed he has kept me from deception. for the record, I don't read Lewis for devotions, but Spurgeon, or mostly the Bible. "whoever thinks he stands must be careful not to fall" 1 Cor 10:12

    GOD Bless

    ReplyDelete
  14. www.lasttrumpetministries.org/tracts/narnia_chronicles.html

    It says a lot for C.S. Lewis that his Chronicles of Narnia can "be found in occult bookstores everywhere!"

    This is according to the late pastor Meyer. Surely any mature Christian growing in "grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ" (2 Peter 3.18) can see that there is something altogether very troubling about C.S.Lewis's writings/teachings/influence?
    Pastor Meyer was an a-millennial Pentecostal preacher, I would listen to his sermons every Sunday until his death some eight years ago. I was influenced by him, even sending donations, but subsequently I began to find fault with his teachings when I dug deeper into God's word for myself. Nevertheless, there are preachers/teachers from across every denominational divide that write against C.S. Lewis, and NOT without good reason! (the last link was from a Reformed Irish Presbyterian minister-Rev Ivan Foster).

    I first became aware of C.S. Lewis nearly 20 years ago when attending an Alpha Course where his works were heavily promoted, and of course by the very nature of this "introduction to Christianity" many will be influenced by him. But why ever would a truly 'born again' believer subsequently read any works of this 'Christian' mystic? this is a real mystery to me! For have we not left the "first principles" behind as such (Hebrews 5.12)? Sanctification is an on-going process and as we increase in "knowledge" we jettison the false and apostate teachings behind. Nevertheless, I thank God for false teachers, for through them I heard the Master's voice!

    God bless.

    ReplyDelete
  15. There are born again believers in the Anglican churches that can see the apostasy that is happening within the CofE. They are not blind to what is happening. This recent sermon from bishop Okoh is testament that there is a growing number in Anglican fellowships who see a need for separation and I think that the current conference in Jerusalem (GAFCON 3) is nailing its colours to the cross of Christ and calling out those who are falling (if not fallen) from the true gospel.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZjIUj9-MT4

    Have a listen to these brothers too who are attending the conference:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpfAIEORDu8

    This movement seems to be spearheaded by faithful African congregations who have joined with western counterparts to make a stand. The Lord has His people doing His work in all fellowships so lets pray for this move...No one in their right mind could say that Biship Okoh is not born again...He is a dear brother who is standing in the gap instead of running away from the enemy...We need to take a lesson that it is important to "make a stand" for the truth and not "run away" at the first sight of false teachers entering...instead tell them that you don't agree with them...let us not run away from false teachers but call them out...That is what these brothers and sisters at GAFCON are doing and we should pray for them. Every blessing.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Treena,

    You are a very blessed and wise lady. The apostasy's feeding the ecumenical movement are off the chart. CS Lewis, without any doubts, served the RCC as do all the current heretical preachers.

    I've been blessed with a gift too, I see things others cannot. What I see, very few can explain or understand. Family and friends think I'm crazy.

    The first seal is already opened. The second seal will be opened soon.

    Godspeed Sister

    ReplyDelete
  17. Thank you Anonymous. Be careful - the Antichrist comes out conquering and to conquer. Revelation 6:1 I don't think this is happening yet.
    God bless

    ReplyDelete
  18. http://www.zephaniah.eu/index_htm_files/Lupus Occultus.pdf

    interesting read on C.S. Lewis

    ReplyDelete